Trump’s advisers prepare to challenge ballot disqualifications in Colorado and Maine

Former president Donald Trump’s advisers are preparing as soon as Tuesday to file challenges to decisions in Colorado and Maine to disqualify Trump from the Republican primary ballot because of the January 6th, 2021, attack on the Capitol, according to a person familiar with the matter.

In Maine, the challenge to the secretary of state’s decision to block Trump from the ballot will be filed in a state court. But the Colorado decision, which was made by that state’s highest court, will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is likely to face fresh pressure to weigh in on the issue.

On Thursday, Maine became the second state to keep Trump off the primary ballot over challenges stemming from Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which states that any officer of the United States who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution cannot “have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”.

“Every state is different,” Maine’s secretary of state, Shenna Bellows, told a local CBS affiliate Friday morning. “I swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. I fulfilled my duty.”

Trump verdict is like ‘pouring gasoline on a fire that’s already burning’

---

Trump verdict a stunning end to a quintessentially New York legal tale

---

Robert De Niro’s raging at Trump outside courthouse was an extraordinary moment in American public life

---

Israel’s continuing war in Gaza complicates Egyptian balancing act

---

Trump has privately told some people that he believes the Supreme Court will overwhelmingly rule against the Colorado and Maine decisions, according to a person familiar with what he has said. But he has also been critical of the Supreme Court, to which he appointed three conservative justices, creating a supermajority. The court has generally shown little appetite for Trump’s election-related cases.

Unlike with the Colorado decision, which caught many on Trump’s team by surprise, the former president’s advisers had anticipated the Maine outcome for several days. They prepared a statement in advance of the decision and had the bulk of their appeal filing written after the consolidated hearing that Bellows held December 15th, according to a person close to Trump.

The people who have filed ballot challenges have generally argued that Trump incited an insurrection when he encouraged supporters to whom he insisted the election was stolen to march on the Capitol while the 2020 electoral vote was being certified. The former president has been indicted on charges related to the eventual attack on the Capitol, but he has not been criminally charged with “insurrection,” a point his allies have repeatedly made.

On his social media site, Truth Social, Trump has highlighted commentary from Democrats who have suggested discomfort with the ballot decisions.

In Maine, the move was made unilaterally by Bellows after challenges were filed. Trump allies have repeatedly highlighted Bellows’ Democratic Party affiliation and the fact that she is not an elected official but an appointed one.

The twin decisions have created an uncertain terrain in the Republican nominating contest with elections in the early states set to begin January 15th, with Iowa’s caucuses. Additional ballot challenges may be filed in other states, although several have fizzled.

This week, a Wisconsin complaint trying to remove Trump from the ballot there was dismissed, and the secretary of state in California said Trump would remain on the ballot in that state. According to the website Lawfare, 14 states have active lawsuits seeking to remove Trump, with more expected to be filed. A decision is expected soon in a case in Oregon.

The Colorado and Maine decisions require an additional focus of resources and attention for a Trump team that is already spread thin across four criminal indictments in four states.

Trump and his team have tried to collapse these cases into a single narrative that Democrats are engaged in a “witch hunt” against him, and they have used the election suits to suggest that Democrats are interfering in an election – an effort to turn the tables given that Trump’s months-long effort to undermine the 2020 election is at the heart of legal and political arguments against him.

“Democrats in blue states are recklessly and un-Constitutionally suspending the civil rights of the American voters by attempting to summarily remove President Trump’s name from ballots,” Trump’s spokesperson, Steven Cheung, said in a statement.

The ballot rulings have become another focus for the mainstream and conservative news media, chewing up time and attention that Trump’s primary rivals, who trail him by wide margins in polls, need in hopes of catching up.

Chris Christie, a former governor of New Jersey who is among those challenging Trump for the nomination, said that the decision “makes him a martyr,” adding, “He’s very good at playing ‘Poor me, poor me.’ He’s always complaining.”

Because of a number of factors, it is unclear how much of a practical effect the efforts to remove Trump from primary ballots will have for the Republican nominating contest. In the case of Colorado, where the state’s top court reversed a lower-court ruling and declared Trump ineligible for the primary, he remains on the ballot while he asks the Supreme Court to intervene. - This article originally appeared in The New York Times

2023 The New York Times Company